- Obama’s covert drone war in numbers: ten times more strikes than Bush
- Article Metrics
- Revealed: al-Qaeda's 22 tips for dodging drones
- Al Qaeda commander killed by US drone strike in Yemen - The National
Obama’s covert drone war in numbers: ten times more strikes than Bush
In Basra, a small farming village in central Somalia near Mogadishu, the number of al-Shabaab militants jumped from an estimated 50 or so in the fall of to by February this year, according to local residents. Like roughly 1, other families from Basra, she and her children fled the town for an internally displaced—persons camp on the outskirts of Mogadishu after al-Shabaab tried to recruit her son. Things in Mogadishu itself, meanwhile, are changing. While the capital was once considered quite dangerous, it has experienced prolonged periods free of Al Shabaab attacks for the first time in years.
Between the end of last October and the end of February, the city suffered no vehicle-born IED attacks—the longest dry spell in nearly 10 years, according to Jason Warner, a researcher with the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point. According to Africom, in that time U.
And this is where we get into the idea of us supporting political efforts. Yet even as this increase in activity by U. All levels of government still struggle to perform basic functions, such as collecting taxes and providing public services in major cities, much less exert authority in more rural areas. Advisers to the United States and the United Nations mission in Somalia often describe the country as one of the most complex environments for Western state-building efforts. Somalia is constantly embroiled in nuanced and ever-changing clan disputes. The protracted war with al-Shabaab has created an economy in which some Somali elites benefit from the influx of foreign aid, and therefore seek to maintain the status quo.
Successful state building in Somalia will require considerable American investment. Their military counterparts are afforded both more resources and mobility.
- Secrets Behind the Door?
- Al Qaeda commander killed by US drone strike in Yemen?
- Jihadi Drones - ISIS Al-Qaeda Hamas Hizbullah & Others | Middle East Media Research Institute.
- Modern Economic Problems.
As a result, U. The country has also been without an ambassador for nearly a year, after former Ambassador Stephen Schwartz abruptly left his post in October Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula AQAP have had a presence in the area for years, their membership rose from around in up to an estimated 1, today. In an attempt to combat this rise in manpower, the US has escalated its infamous drone program, allegedly targeting high-ranking AQAP members.
Is this hit-and-hope policy really the best way to fight al Qaeda in Yemen? Or are these drone strikes, which have a habit of killing civilians, exactly the PR ammo al Qaeda need to lure new recruits in a country that is already as politically stable as a gang of jihadists on a bouncy castle? Michael Boyle, an expert on terrorism and political violence, and author of The Costs and Consequences of Drone Warfare , told me about some vital differences between the two when it comes to patterns of al-Qaeda affiliation.
In Yemen, however, al Qaeda membership is dominated by people who were born and raised in the country, with deep connections to the local tribal structures. An MQ-9 Reaper. This means that when a drone strike kills an unintended target, it is likely to be someone's brother, father, uncle, or son; sister, mother, aunt, or daughter. This situation is probably going to breed more desire for retribution than the death of a fellow soldier, no matter how strong the thirst for vengeful jihad.
There is also the threat of killing someone with strong connections to a clan or tribe and generating a level of public outrage that could destabilize the Yemeni government. It is these close-knit ties of people who may not have any kind of connection to al Qaeda that make Yemen a completely different battlefield to Afghanistan or Pakistan.
Revealed: al-Qaeda's 22 tips for dodging drones
Daniel L. Despite the obvious benefits of using drones and the problems associated with the alternatives, numerous critics argue that drones still have too many disadvantages. First among them is an unacceptably high level of civilian casualties. Admittedly, drones have killed innocents. But the real debate is over how many and whether alternative approaches are any better.
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reports that in , drone strikes killed as many as noncombatants, including as many as 9 children. But these claims are based on the fact that the U. This approach makes it even more difficult to distinguish between combatants and civilians and verify body counts of each. Still, as one U. The truth is that all the public numbers are unreliable. Who constitutes a civilian is often unclear; when trying to kill the Pakistani Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud, for example, the United States also killed his doctor.
The doctor was not targeting U. In addition, most strikes are carried out in such remote locations that it is nearly impossible for independent sources to verify who was killed. Thus, although the New America Foundation has come under fire for relying heavily on unverifiable information provided by anonymous U. After a strike in Pakistan, militants often cordon off the area, remove their dead, and admit only local reporters sympathetic to their cause or decide on a body count themselves.
The U. As a result, statistics on civilians killed by drones are often inflated. But even the most unfavorable estimates of drone casualties reveal that the ratio of civilian to militant deaths—about one to three, according to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism—is lower than it would be for other forms of strikes. Bombings by Fs or Tomahawk cruise missile salvos, for example, pack a much more deadly payload. In December , the United States fired Tomahawks at a suspected terrorist training camp in Yemen, and over 30 people were killed in the blast, most of them women and children.
Al Qaeda commander killed by US drone strike in Yemen - The National
Civilian deaths are tragic and pose political problems. But the data show that drones are more discriminate than other types of force.
- INVENTION Natural Critical Thinking.
- Finding a Little Courage: a horror short story (from Terry Persun’s short story collection Book 4).
- Latest Clips.
- Al Qaeda militants killed by drone strike in Yemen - The National;
- Charm of a Small Town.
It is also telling that drones have earned the backing, albeit secret, of foreign governments. In order to maintain popular support, politicians in Pakistan and Yemen routinely rail against the U. In reality, however, the governments of both countries have supported it.
During the Bush and Obama administrations, Pakistan has even periodically hosted U. As officials in both Pakistan and Yemen realize, U. Thus, in private, Pakistan supports the drone program. Still, Pakistan is reluctant to make its approval public. Even more important, the Pakistani public is vehemently opposed to U.
A poll found that 74 percent of Pakistanis viewed the United States as their enemy, likely in part because of the ongoing drone campaign.
https://senjouin-renshu.com/wp-content/94/3058-buscar-personas.php Similarly, in Yemen, as the scholar Gregory Johnsen has pointed out, drone strikes can win the enmity of entire tribes. Such concerns are valid, but the level of local anger over drones is often lower than commonly portrayed. Many surveys of public opinion related to drones are conducted by anti-drone organizations, which results in biased samples. Other surveys exclude those who are unaware of the drone program and thus overstate the importance of those who are angered by it. In addition, many Pakistanis do not realize that the drones often target the very militants who are wreaking havoc on their country.
And for most Pakistanis and Yemenis, the most important problems they struggle with are corruption, weak representative institutions, and poor economic growth; the drone program is only a small part of their overall anger, most of which is directed toward their own governments. A poll conducted in , well before the drone campaign had expanded to its current scope, found that only 15 percent of Pakistanis had a favorable opinion of the United States.